I think you don’t really get my ‘review’, Paul.

There were a few exhibits I didn’t “get”, as I acknowledge at the end. But the somewhat “disgusting” ones I reckon I got perfectly well, and describing them as such is hardly intended as a damning criticism, since I believe that reaction is entirely consistent with the artist’s aim… as I say in the opening line of the ‘review’.

(Incidentally it’s conventional to put quote marks around a word to indicate that someone else used it first.)

I’m puzzled why you bothered writing this ‘review’.