Log In | Subscribe
Features

Hirst’s unburstable bubble

  25th October 2008  —  Issue 151
I got it wrong. Very wrong. More wrong, perhaps, than anyone has ever got anything wrong in the history of art, or at least the history of art market reporting

On the eve of “Beautiful Inside My Head Forever,” Damien Hirst’s two-day Sotheby’s auction in mid-September, I predicted in the Evening Standard that the sale would tank. Instead, it made almost £112m, way more than the £65m estimate and a world record for an artist. Many lots soared above their estimates, a couple going for three times the low figure. Fragments of Paradise, a huge cabinet lined with neat rows of industrially produced diamonds, fetched £5.2m, against an estimate of £1m-£1.5m. The star lot was The Golden Calf, a bull in a large gold-plated formaldehyde fish tank-a symbol of the worship of a false god. It went for £10m, bang in the middle of the range. The Kingdom-yet another Hirst shark-went for £9.6m, well above the £4m-£6m estimate. This was an incredible, gravity-defying feat. As the sale started, one of America’s largest investment banks went bankrupt, and a giant insurance company, AIG, was saved only by nationalisation just as the auction ended. The shares of even solid, boring banks were crashing in London and New York. The art market was sending a confusing message. Could it really be that a dead bull floating in a tank was a safer home for your cash than a deposit at the Halifax?

I watched my predictions being shredded from the outside. Sotheby’s had taken a dislike to my cynicism about the top end of the contemporary art market; they banned me from attending the auction as a journalist, citing an Evening Standard article I wrote almost a year ago, called “Who put the ‘con’ in contemporary art?” I was left to prowl the pavements and the public screening rooms on the lower floors of the auction house, trying to work out how I had got it so wrong. Had the art world taken leave of its senses? My fellow critics all had a thought of the day for me. “You shouldn’t speak too soon,” said Carol Vogel, who writes about art for the New York Times. “Don’t worry Ben, I know sod all about the art market as well,” said Bloomberg’s contemporary art reporter Scott Reyburn, with great modesty-two days earlier he had advised me that the sale would be a hit.

Dealers smiled victoriously at me. “How did it go so well?” I asked Alberto Mugrabi, a member of one of New York’s biggest art collecting clans, who is said to own 10 per cent of the world’s important Warhols. “Because Damien is brilliant,” he replied, hugging me and then walking off.

This article is available to subscribers only

Subscribing to Prospect is the most reliable and convenient way to receive the magazine every month, and offers the best value.

Subscription Types:

Print

As a print edition subscriber you can get over 20 per cent discounted from our cover price. Have the magazine delivered straight to your door each month, starting at just £16 for six months. All print subscriptions now come with a free online subscription which includes complete access to our searchable archive. Buy a subscription now »

Online

An online subscription offers you complete and unlimited access to the entire website, including our searchable archive of every back issue of Prospect, and a PDF edition of each new issue: all this for just £20 per year. Purchase an online subscription »

Renewal

Renew an existing subscription »

Institutional access

If you are a library, business organisation or any other large institution that needs a multi-user licence, you can obtain institutional access.
  • Comment Subscribe to post comments