Log In | Subscribe
Features

Disenchanted democracies

  29th February 2008  —  Issue 143
Citizens in rich democracies are becoming both more sceptical towards government and more demanding of it, leading to a "crisis of disengagement." This won't be reversed by institutional reform—better to focus on the democracy of everyday life

When Gordon Brown, in one of his first acts as prime minister, issued his green paper “The Governance of Britain,” he was in part responding to the view, commonplace in the political class, that there is a “crisis of disengagement” from politics.

What is less commonly acknowledged is that this disengagement is close to being a general phenomenon across “mature” and even not so mature democracies. While British commentators sounded the alarm when voter turnout dipped below 60 per cent in the 2001 general election, few noticed that this was part of a wider trend. Historic postwar lows in electoral turnout were also recorded in the Netherlands in 1998, in Austria and Portugal in 1999, in Spain in 2000, in Italy in 2001, in Ireland in 2002 and in Germany in 2005. British political parties have been haemorrhaging members at the rate of about one every 12 minutes since 1980. But party membership among the democracies of western Europe almost halved between 1980 and 2000. The British public’s trust in government has almost halved since the mid-1970s. But the decline has been more rapid in Italy, and many more Swedes, Finns, Austrians and Germans now think their politicians lose touch with voters as soon as they are elected than was the case 30 years ago.

The ubiquity of the trend across markedly different societies and political systems underlines the main objection to the conventional wisdom about democratic disengagement—that it is the fault of governments and politicians. Some accounts focus on particular scandals (cash for peerages and so on) or crises that have damaged public confidence. Others stress the declining performance of governments. On this view, citizens have lost trust in government simply because government is doing less to earn it. In the US, the presidential campaign of Barack Obama, with its relentless focus on the idea that Washington isn’t working, is built squarely on this theme. Obama taps into a public belief that politics used to be a nobler, more ambitious enterprise than it is today. “It’s not the magnitude of our problems that concerns me the most,” he has said often on the stump. “It’s the smallness of our politics.”

This article is available to subscribers only

Subscribing to Prospect is the most reliable and convenient way to receive the magazine every month, and offers the best value.

Subscription Types:

Print

As a print edition subscriber you can get over 20 per cent discounted from our cover price. Have the magazine delivered straight to your door each month, starting at just £16 for six months. All print subscriptions now come with a free online subscription which includes complete access to our searchable archive. Buy a subscription now »

Online

An online subscription offers you complete and unlimited access to the entire website, including our searchable archive of every back issue of Prospect, and a PDF edition of each new issue: all this for just £20 per year. Purchase an online subscription »

Renewal

Renew an existing subscription »

Institutional access

If you are a library, business organisation or any other large institution that needs a multi-user licence, you can obtain institutional access.
  • Comment Subscribe to post comments