The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins
(Bantam, £20)
It has been obvious for years that Richard Dawkins had a fat book on religion in him, but who would have thought him capable of writing one this bad? Incurious, dogmatic, rambling and self-contradictory, it has none of the style or verve of his earlier works.
In his broad thesis, Dawkins is right. Religions are potentially dangerous, and in their popular forms profoundly irrational. The agnostics must be right and the atheists very well may be. There is no purpose to the universe. Nothing inconsistent with the laws of physics has been reliably reported. To demand a designer to explain the complexity of the world begs the question, “Who designed the designer?” It has been clear since Darwin that we have no need to hypothesise a designer to explain the complexity of living things. The results of intercessory prayer are indistinguishable from those of chance.
If you are a subscriber, please log in »
This article is available to subscribers only
Subscribing to Prospect is the most reliable and convenient way to receive the magazine every month, and offers the best value.Subscription Types:
Online
An online subscription offers you complete and unlimited access to the entire website, including our searchable archive of every back issue of Prospect, and a PDF edition of each new issue: all this for just £20 per year. Purchase an online subscription »Renewal
Renew an existing subscription »Institutional access
If you are a library, business organisation or any other large institution that needs a multi-user licence, you can obtain institutional access.
Share
Subscribe to post comments
Comments (4):
Print
[...] the damning review in Prospect magazine of The God Delusion (who had previously voted Dawkins as one of the world’s [...]
[...] It has been obvious for years that Richard Dawkins had a fat book on religion in him, but who would have thought him capable of writing one this bad? Incurious, dogmatic, rambling and self-contradictory, it has none of the style or verve of his earlier works. Andrew Brown, Prospect, 21st October 2006 — Issue 127 [...]
[...] It has been obvious for years that Richard Dawkins had a fat book on religion in him, but who would have thought him capable of writing one this bad? Incurious, dogmatic, rambling and self-contradictory, it has none of the style or verve of his earlier works. Andrew Brown, Prospect, 21st October 2006 — Issue 127 [...]
While I agree that the book overstates things a bit, I think you might have picked on some of the wrong arguments.
For example, I think there’s difference between doing wrong in the name of atheism, and doing wrong as an atheist. As I understand it Stalin wasn’t driven to exterminate priests because of his atheistic beliefs; he did so because the Church’s authority threatened his own. Hitler and Mussolini were wary of religion for just that reason.
And arguing that the armies of France didn’t march under the icon of the Virgin doesn’t prove they killed for atheism. It simply proves they didn’t kill for religion. There are other reasons: land, power, xenophobia.
Dawkins’ point is that atheism never drives people to violence. As he says himself, atheists do do evil. Just never because of their atheism. Which makes complete sense: how can you go to war because of an absence of belief.
Maybe one day Darwinists will be forced to fight for evolution, but it hasn’t happened yet.