Log In | Subscribe
Features

Cherchez l’enfant

  22nd October 2005  —  Issue 115
It looks like a golden age for children's writing. A British tradition has been reinvigorated by two good, though overrated, authors. JK Rowling and Philip Pullman differ from previous classic authors in aiming at a slightly older age range, and their metaphysics are silly. Still, they reflect our times

When I was at prep school at the end of the 1950s, Wednesday was a red-letter day, because it was then that Eagle arrived. This was the only comic that we were allowed to read, and it is a tribute to Eagle’s quality that we revelled in it even though it was lawful. The first two pages depicted the adventures of Dan Dare, Pilot of the Future, who did battle with the totalitarian green men of Venus, the Treens, led by their evil genius, the Mekon. That was the best of the adventure strips; the others were of variable quality, but none was contemptible either as story or as artwork. There was Luck of the Legion, a rip-off of Beau Geste; there was a cowboy, Jeff Arnold, Rider of the Range; there was Storm Nelson, who sailed round the world with a small private fleet foiling villains; and there was historical adventure with Jack O’Lantern, an English boy living in Napoleonic times. The best of the funny strips was Harris Tweed, Extra Special Agent, featuring the exploits of an incompetent sleuth; wittily drawn by John Ryan, it was surprisingly sophisticated in its humour. There were other features beside the strips. The centrefold was a cut-open picture of something mechanical, usually a ship, plane or train. There was a page of reporting from Macdonald Hastings, Eagle Special Investigator. There was a letter from the editor and items about hobbies. On the back page there was a different kind of strip, telling the life story of a real person. Sometimes the subject was a famous Christian, like St Paul or Livingstone, but more often he was a secular hero such as Marco Polo or Baden-Powell. Eagle’s greatest ever success was the life of Winston Churchill, skilfully told by Clifford Makins and superbly illustrated by Frank Bellamy. I can still relive the excitement with which we clustered round each new Eagle on its arrival to see the latest pictures of second world war blitz and battle.

Eagle is so vastly different from anything on the market today that it has become a document of historical and sociological importance; nostalgia is therefore not only a temptation but a duty. It was edited by Marcus Morris, an elegantly unconventional clergyman, who had founded it with the aim of improving boys’ reading matter. Like Baden-Powell, founder of the scout movement, Morris understood what made boys tick. Whereas The Boy’s Own Paper (then nearing the end of its long life) and Young Elizabethan exuded a perceptible atmosphere of moral uplift, there was no feeling with Eagle that you were being patronised or got at. And indeed, part of Morris’s secret was that he respected his young readers. He believed that small boys could appreciate a product of high quality (the artwork in Eagle Annual above all, which came out each year at Christmas time, was of a standard that one can barely imagine today). He also trusted their attention span: the life of Churchill ran for a year and at least one of the Dan Dare stories for even longer. He assumed that boys would be keen on science and machinery, and could be educated intelligently in these subjects. Some things in Eagle were more grown-up in presentation than a good deal that passes for cultural programming on television now. Marcus Morris would not have dreamed of patronising a nine year old the way that Simon Schama or Tony Robinson patronise the adult public.

Much in the media today is designed deliberately to debase public taste: Viz and FHM, Big Brother and I’m a Celebrity… achieve their success by coarsening the spirits of their consumers. It is hard to conceive of anyone now starting a magazine to elevate and enlarge young people’s experience, let alone bringing it off, and that tells us something disagreeable about the present time. To be sure, Eagle had its limitations, and it was the product of its era. (Morris gave up the editorship in 1959, and it then went rapidly downhill; by the end of the 1960s it was dead.) The arts were absent from it, even pop music, and despite the editor’s dog-collar, there was no religion either, except when a Christian hero was on the back page. The world it depicted was almost totally male, with the curious exception of Professor Jocelyn Peabody, the brainy boffin in Dan Dare, who was young, blonde, bossy and looked great in a spacesuit. Conversely, Eagle’s sister paper, Girl, was almost as thoroughly female: Susan of St Bride’s (the adventures of a student nurse) and Belle of the Ballet were two of the most popular strips. The heroes were all unmarried, and there was never a hint of sex.

This article is available to subscribers only

Subscribing to Prospect is the most reliable and convenient way to receive the magazine every month, and offers the best value.

Subscription Types:

Print

As a print edition subscriber you can get over 20 per cent discounted from our cover price. Have the magazine delivered straight to your door each month, starting at just £16 for six months. All print subscriptions now come with a free online subscription which includes complete access to our searchable archive. Buy a subscription now »

Online

An online subscription offers you complete and unlimited access to the entire website, including our searchable archive of every back issue of Prospect, and a PDF edition of each new issue: all this for just £20 per year. Purchase an online subscription »

Renewal

Renew an existing subscription »

Institutional access

If you are a library, business organisation or any other large institution that needs a multi-user licence, you can obtain institutional access.
  • Comment Subscribe to post comments