Log In | Subscribe
Features

Human rights and terrorism

  25th September 2005  —  Issue 114
The Human Rights Act is a welcome constraint on government. But can it threaten our ability to fight terrorism?

Dear Roger
9th August 2005

The Human Rights Act—one of New Labour’s great constitutional innovations—is a welcome check on the “democratic absolutism” of British governments. By entrenching the European convention on human rights in our law, it requires public bodies—schools, prisons, government departments and so on—to uphold basic human rights, such as privacy or the right to a fair trial. This constrains crude majoritarianism, but the act is also designed to preserve most aspects of parliamentary sovereignty. A judge can declare an existing law incompatible with the Human Rights Act (HRA), and it is then left to parliament to change the law; but if parliament decides not to it may find itself before the European court of human rights in Strasbourg.

So the principle is sound enough. But as the government now seeks to combat religious extremism and terrorism with new laws, two aspects of the act—and indeed the wider human rights movement—give me cause for concern. The first is the transnational character of the act. The HRA requires public authorities to respect the human rights of all individuals in Britain, whether British citizens, those temporarily here or even those illegally here. For this reason, the government may find it difficult to deport foreign clerics even if they incite terrorism. (It has been unable, for example, to return to Afghanistan those involved in the dramatic hijacking of a plane to Stansted in 2000.)

This requirement to give non-citizens many of the legal protections of citizens in today’s conditions of global migration and cross-national terrorism is untenable. Furthermore, it seems to be connected to a wider fallacy about the origin and nature of rights. People are not born with rights, and, regrettably, many of the world’s 6bn people have few or none. Rights are a social construct, a product of history, of ideas and of institutions. You and I have rights not as human beings, but mainly because we belong to the political and national community called the United Kingdom, with its infrastructure of laws and institutions.

This article is available to subscribers only

Subscribing to Prospect is the most reliable and convenient way to receive the magazine every month, and offers the best value.

Subscription Types:

Print

As a print edition subscriber you can get over 20 per cent discounted from our cover price. Have the magazine delivered straight to your door each month, starting at just £16 for six months. All print subscriptions now come with a free online subscription which includes complete access to our searchable archive. Buy a subscription now »

Online

An online subscription offers you complete and unlimited access to the entire website, including our searchable archive of every back issue of Prospect, and a PDF edition of each new issue: all this for just £20 per year. Purchase an online subscription »

Renewal

Renew an existing subscription »

Institutional access

If you are a library, business organisation or any other large institution that needs a multi-user licence, you can obtain institutional access.
  • Comment Subscribe to post comments