Log In | Subscribe
Features

Operation Anaconda

  20th December 2002  —  Issue 81
The failures of the only pitched battle the US army fought against al Qaeda in Afghanistan provide grounds for anxiety about a future conflict in the streets of Baghdad

In early February, US commanders in Afghanistan thought they had finally cornered al Qaeda. Since the fall of Kabul in November, American forces had played a game of cat and mouse with guerrillas in the southern mountains, unable to bring them to battle. Now intelligence showed al Qaeda units had gathered in strength in the Shahikot valley, a steep-sided gorge close to the Pakistani border. Best of all, from the point of view of US commander Major General Franklin “Buster” Hagenbeck, the decisive battle would go to the army, rather than their rivals, the Marine Corps. The Marines had taken combat honours the previous year, with an assault on Kandahar. Now it was the army’s turn.

The build-up took weeks. This was the legacy of Washington’s decision, early in the war, not to commit mainstream ground troops to the war in Afghanistan. The policy was only overturned when it became clear that, following the capture of Kabul, the Taleban and al Qaeda remained a threat. But it would take many weeks to fly in infantry units, supplies and their heavy equipment.

The plan was simple: Afghan units, backed by US air power, would attack from the eastern ridgeline while US forces would land at seven points to the west. The Afghans would seize the ridge, driving al Qaeda across the valley and up the western slope-straight into the guns of the waiting Americans (the operation was named Anaconda, after the giant snake that wraps itself around its prey). Throughout the preparations, al Qaeda forces stayed obligingly in place. But Hagenbeck had other problems. His own division, the 10th Mountain, would lead the assault, yet despite its name, its troops lacked the fitness for high altitude fighting. Another problem was the lack of artillery. Artillery was seen as “old war” in an army now in thrall to the possibilities of high-tech gear. In the Gulf and Kosovo, air power had achieved decisive victories at little cost to friendly forces (the US-led coalition won the Kosovo war without a single combat death). In the early days of the Afghan war, US jets had blasted Taleban positions on the flat open plains. But now the terrain was different.

This article is available to subscribers only

Subscribing to Prospect is the most reliable and convenient way to receive the magazine every month, and offers the best value.

Subscription Types:

Print

As a print edition subscriber you can get over 20 per cent discounted from our cover price. Have the magazine delivered straight to your door each month, starting at just £16 for six months. All print subscriptions now come with a free online subscription which includes complete access to our searchable archive. Buy a subscription now »

Online

An online subscription offers you complete and unlimited access to the entire website, including our searchable archive of every back issue of Prospect, and a PDF edition of each new issue: all this for just £20 per year. Purchase an online subscription »

Renewal

Renew an existing subscription »

Institutional access

If you are a library, business organisation or any other large institution that needs a multi-user licence, you can obtain institutional access.
  • Comment Subscribe to post comments